The week opened on the back foot and ended at a record high. The S&P 500 closed Friday at 7,473.47, up 0.37% on the day and 0.9% for the week, notching its eighth straight winning week. Thatâs the longest weekly win streak since late 2023. The Dow added 294 points Friday to finish at 50,579.70, also a new record close, with the index gaining 2.1% on the week. The Nasdaq Composite tacked on 0.19% Friday to 26,343.97, up 0.5% for the week and posting its seventh advance in the past eight weeks. The Russell 2000 added 0.84%, leading the major averages on the session as rate-sensitive small caps caught a bid.
The weekâs defining moment came on Friday morning. Kevin Warsh was sworn in as Federal Reserve Chair in the White House East Room, replacing Jerome Powell after eight years. Justice Clarence Thomas administered the oath. Trump told the crowd, âI want Kevin to be totally independent. Donât look at me, donât look at anybody.â Markets had largely priced in the transition, but Warshâs reform-oriented tone in his first remarks signals a meaningful shift in Fed communication. Powell will stay on as a governor, the first time a Fed chair has done so in nearly 80 years. Stephen Miran resigned to make room for Warsh on the Board.
The bond market did most of the heavy lifting earlier in the week. The 30-year Treasury yield touched 5.19% on Tuesday, the highest reading since 2007, and that print drove a three-day equity selloff Monday through Wednesday. Then the long end began to pull back. By Fridayâs close, the 10-year had eased to 4.54%, down for the third straight session, and the 30-year settled in the 5.05% area. Lower oil prices and improved Iranian negotiation rhetoric helped cool inflation expectations. WTI crude swung from above $108 Monday down to $96 Thursday before climbing back to about $98 Friday morning. Brent finished near $105.
Sector leadership was the cleanest signal of the week. Health Care gained 3.4%, its best week in more than six months, with Merck up over 5% Friday alone. Energy rose with crudeâs volatility but ended the week higher. Technology recovered Friday after Nvidiaâs beat-but-light guidance on Wednesday left the AI complex flat through midweek. Consumer Staples lagged, hit hard by Walmartâs Thursday guidance miss that sent shares down more than 6%. Communications was the only sector lower on Friday, weighed by weakness in Salesforce-adjacent software, despite CRM rallying 2% on the session.
The VIX closed at 16.78, below 17 and consistent with an orderly tape. Gold slipped 0.76% to $4,508 as the safe-haven bid faded with the Iran headlines. The dollar held steady. Breadth improved modestly, with the proportion of S&P 500 stocks above their 200-day average ticking up to roughly 55% from 53.7% midweek. As we noted in last weekâs report, this market has been running on a narrow set of leaders. The rotation into Health Care this week was the first real sign that breadth might be broadening rather than narrowing.
Heading into the holiday-shortened week ahead, the script is set up nicely for a continued grind higher, provided Fridayâs PCE print cooperates. The FOMC minutes released Wednesday confirmed that several officials remain concerned about sticky inflation, which means any hot data this week immediately puts the rate-hike conversation back on the table. As we wrote in our summer market risk piece, the bull market still has structural support, but a single inflation surprise can change the regime quickly.
The S&P 500 closed Friday at 7,473.47, just 43 points and 0.6% below the May 14 all-time high of 7,517.12. The index put in an intraday high of 7,506.32 on Friday before fading slightly into the close. Weâre now sitting comfortably above all three major moving averages, forming a textbook bullish setup. The 20-day sits at 7,336 (1.8% below price), the 50-day at 6,987 (6.5% below), and the 200-day at 6,807 (8.9% below). The bull trend is intact, momentum has improved, and the only thing standing between us and a fresh record is a clean breakout above 7,517.
The 14-day RSI climbed to 68, up from 57 a week ago. Thatâs moving toward overbought, but not there yet. Historically, RSI readings between 60 and 70 during established uptrends produce more gains than losses. The acceleration in the MACD (momentum) indicator suggests a bit more risk, and the sell signal triggered last week remains intact. While that doesnât mean the market will decline, the risk of a correction is increasing. Nonetheless, it does suggest that gains may be somewhat limited.
Breadth tells the same story but more cautiously. Roughly 55% of S&P 500 stocks now trade above their 200-day average, up from 53.7% midweek but still below the 70% reading from April. The Health Care rotation this past week was the first sign that breadth might be broadening. If that continues with Industrials and Financials catching a bid next week on any soft inflation print, the bull case strengthens substantially. If breadth narrows back to just the AI complex carrying the load, thatâs the warning sign to watch.
For traders, the rules for next week are straightforward.
The most important signal from the technicals right now is resilience. The market closed Friday just below record highs despite the 30-year yield touching a near-two-decade high earlier in the week. It did so despite the Fed Chair transition that same morning. That kind of resilience does not happen by accident. It happens when underlying earnings strength and liquidity conditions are firm enough to absorb meaningful macro stress.
Next week, watch the 30-year and 10-year yields first thing Tuesday morning. If long rates resume falling with PCE on deck Friday, equities are set up well for another leg higher. If yields back up on any inflation surprise, the 7,336 20-DMA becomes the first real test of whether the eighth winning week was the top or just a pause.
The week after Memorial Day always packs a heavy data calendar into four trading days, and this one is no exception. Markets are closed on Monday, so traders return Tuesday morning to a stack of macro reports that will set the tone for June. The single most important release of the week is Fridayâs PCE Price Index for April. That is the Fedâs preferred inflation gauge, and it comes out exactly when the bond market needs an answer.
Hereâs the question every desk on Wall Street is asking right now. Did the energy spike from the Iran situation bleed into core inflation, or did the rest of the basket stay tame? Consensus is looking for headline PCE near +0.2% month-over-month and core PCE around +0.2%. Anything above +0.3% on core lights the fuse for another move higher in the long end of the curve. The 30-year yield touched 5.19% this past Tuesday, the first 19-year high. The long end pulled back through the back half of the week. A hot PCE print sends it right back to that resistance, and probably through it.
Before we get to PCE, several mid-week catalysts deserve attention. Tuesday brings Consumer Confidence, which has been drifting lower for three months. Wednesday delivers New Home Sales and the 5-Year Treasury auction, which will be a real-time test of bond demand at current yields. Thursday is the heaviest day, with the second estimate of Q1 GDP, weekly jobless claims, and Pending Home Sales all hitting before the bell. Q1 GDP came in at 2.0% on the advance read, and any meaningful downward revision would feed the slowdown narrative.
This is also Kevin Warshâs first full week as Fed Chair. Any public comments he makes will be scrutinized for clues about his stance on rate cuts versus rate hikes. Markets are pricing the Fed to stay on hold through 2026 with a possible hike in early 2027, despite Trumpâs vocal demands for cuts. Warsh has said he will not âpredetermineâ rates at the presidentâs request, but how he frames inflation in his first weeks shapes the narrative for the rest of his term. Watch for the first scheduled speech or interview.
On the earnings side, the calendar thins out considerably with most of the Q1 season behind us. Salesforce reports Wednesday after the close, and CRM rallied 2% Friday on rotation flow. Costco reports Thursday after the close, and that print matters even more given Walmartâs guidance scare last week. Costcoâs commentary on member traffic and ticket size gives us a much clearer picture of the U.S. consumer. Dell reports the same night, and after Nvidiaâs tepid reaction to Wednesdayâs guidance, the AI capex narrative is on shaky ground. A miss or soft guide from Dell would put serious pressure on the entire enterprise hardware complex.
The asymmetric outcome is still a hot PCE print on Friday. A core read of +0.3% or higher sends the 30-year back above 5.20%. Equities would likely give back some of the eighth-winning-weekâs gains, and the summer correction risk weâve been writing about could come back into focus. The setup is binary, and we find out on Friday morning at 8:30 AM.
The SpaceX IPO will be the largest in history and is priced in less than three weeks. SpaceX filed its public S-1 on Wednesday, targeting a $1.75 trillion valuation, a $75 billion raise, and a Nasdaq debut on June 12 under ticker SPCX. Every client conversation this week has circled back to two questions. Should I buy on day one? And what does this do to the rest of my portfolio? In our recent piece on the spring rally, I argued that this market is running on a small number of mega-cap names. SpaceX walks straight onto that list the moment it trades.
The financial picture in the SpaceX IPO S-1 is unlike anything weâve seen at this valuation. SpaceX lost $4.9 billion in 2025 on $18.7 billion in revenue, and losses widened this year. Q1 2026 alone produced a $4.3 billion loss on $4.7 billion in revenue. The company lost almost as much in three months as it generated in revenue. Thatâs not a typo.
Itâs really three businesses stitched together. Starlink is the only profitable piece, contributing $11.4 billion in 2025 revenue and a $1.19 billion operating profit in Q1 2026. The launch and satellite business added $4.1 billion but isnât profitable. The xAI division, folded in via the February merger, lost $6.36 billion in 2025 and $2.47 billion in Q1 2026 on just $818 million in revenue. A profitable connectivity business sits next to a cash-burning launch operation and an AI startup lighting money on fire.
Musk holds 85.1% of voting power through 10-to-1 super-voting Class B shares. He cannot be removed as CEO. Buying SPCX on day one means buying a 14.9% voting interest in a company controlled by one person, whose other firms, Tesla and X, among them, are deeply intertwined with this one. That alone is a longer-term risk to consider.
Anyway, what you really want to know is whether you should buy the SpaceX IPO. I canât tell you that, as you will have to determine that risk profile for yourself. However, I can provide you with some information to assist with your decision-making. Letâs start with the lock-up periods for insiders.
Youâll hear âfear of missing outâ applied to the SpaceX IPO more than any IPO this cycle. The brand is recognizable, the scale is unprecedented, and the hype machine is running. But the lockup schedule is where investors need to focus. The early investors and SPVs that have been accumulating SpaceX shares for a decade get their first window to sell well before the company reports a single quarter as a public entity.
Musk and the largest insiders are locked up for 366 days. Pre-IPO investors holding through funds and SPVs face a 180-day lockup with early-release provisions baked in. Up to 20% of eligible shares can be sold shortly after SpaceXâs first quarterly results in early November 2026, with another 10% released if the stock holds a certain level on that date. Thatâs a planned exit overhang sitting above the stock through late 2026.
Now layer in the capex picture. SpaceX spent $20.7 billion in 2025. Fully 61% of that, $12.7 billion, went to xAIâs data center buildout. Launch and satellite combined spent $8 billion. Compare that to the public-market hyperscalers. Amazon, Microsoft, and Alphabet are each spending more than $90 billion annually on AI infrastructure in 2026. SpaceX is competing in AI with roughly a tenth of what rivals deploy. To stay competitive, that number must go higher. To get to profitability, it must come down. Those two paths are incompatible.
Next, there is the index impact. This is the part of the SpaceX IPO most retail investors arenât thinking about, and the part that matters most for the broader market. On May 1, 2026, Nasdaq updated its Nasdaq 100 inclusion rules. Large new listings can now join within 15 trading days of going public, down from a three-month seasoning period. The change was designed for SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic. The seasoning period existed for a reason. It gave the market time for price discovery before forced index buying distorted the tape. That window is now gone.
Hereâs what that means in dollar terms. The Nasdaq 100 is tracked by more than 200 investment products with over $600 billion in assets. If SpaceX fast-tracks into the index 15 trading days after pricing, every passive Nasdaq 100 fund becomes a forced buyer. When Tesla joined the S&P 500 in 2020, forced index demand drove the stock from $400 to $700 in three weeks before fundamentals entered the conversation. Index funds had no choice. Their mandate is to track the benchmark, not to price-discover the new constituent.
The S&P 500 is the bigger story. Current rules require 12 months of public trading and four straight quarters of GAAP profitability, neither of which SpaceX satisfies. But in late April, S&P Dow Jones Indices launched a formal consultation on rule changes tailored to the SpaceX IPO, along with subsequent blockbusters coming like Anthropic and OpenAI. The proposal cuts the listing requirement to six months and waives the profitability test entirely for megacap names. The new rules could be in place before SpaceXâs IPO in June. Why is this so important? As noted above, the passive index problem is magnified by the S&P 500, which is benchmarked to roughly $24 trillion and is roughly 40 times the size of the Nasdaq 100. If S&P adopts before SpaceX trades, the forced-buying problem isnât a Nasdaq problem. Itâs the whole index complex.
âNasdaq sold out passive investors by guaranteeing inclusion to SpaceX, clearing the way for more tech giants to do the same. Investors in Nasdaq funds will end up becoming forced buyers of these assets at the highest valuations the public markets have ever seen.â
TheStreet, May 5, 2026
The broader risk is concentration. The Magnificent 7 already drives more than 30% of the S&P 500âs market cap. Adding a $1.75 trillion SpaceX means a single CEO now exerts gravitational pull over Tesla, SpaceX, and the entire Nasdaq 100. Index investors donât realize the idiosyncratic risk theyâre taking on.
The question I get asked most. Should I buy the SpaceX IPO on June 12th or hold off? I canât tell you that specifically. However, the answer is in the data if you are so inclined. Academic research on IPO performance is unambiguous. The intraday high almost always prints in the first 30 to 90 minutes of trading on day one. Institutional allocates flip into retail demand, momentum buyers pile in, and the peak prints before the bid can absorb it all. From there, prices fade in a remarkably consistent pattern.
Hot-market IPOs decline 4% to 8% by day oneâs closing print. By week one, prices have faded 8% to 18% from the peak. Greenshoe stabilization kicks in here, where underwriters buy back up to 15% of the offering. But that cushions the floor near the offer price, not the day-one high. Weeks three and four are pure price discovery. The average cohort sits 12% to 23% below the peak. Stocks with more than 60% first-day returns actually underperform stocks with no first-day pop over the following year.
Three factors make the day-one peak likely to be high and the fade steep for SpaceX.
If you must own SPCX on day one, expect to be down 15% to 25% by the time the first earnings print arrives in November. If you wait until that print and let the lockup overhang clear, you almost certainly buy at a better price. Thatâs not a recommendation against owning SpaceX. Itâs a recommendation against buying it at the most expensive point in its public life.
However, there is no guarantee that it will be the case. That is just what the history of other IPOs tells us, so measure your risk accordingly.
The SpaceX IPO will be a defining event for this market cycle. The hype is enormous, the index distortion is real, and the post-IPO fade is one of the most consistent patterns in market history. Here are five tactical principles to consider.
Make no mistake. The SpaceX IPO will be enormous, and the company is one of the most impressive of our generation. The launch business is unmatched, Starlink is genuinely changing global connectivity, and the founder has a track record few can compete with. None of that changes the math of what happens when a 109Ă revenue, money-losing, single-CEO-controlled company gets airdropped into the largest passive index complex in history. Great companies and great investments are not the same thing. The price you pay matters. Day one is likely to be the worst price youâll pay for SPCX in the next twelve months.
But no one really knows for sure.
Written by: Lance Roberts @Real Investment Advice
The post âSpaceX IPO: Should I Buy It, Or Wait?â first appeared on Real Investment Advice