Iran war ‘largest disruption to crude supplies in history of global oil market’, says IEA
The Iran war has triggered an even bigger oil shock than the Arab oil embargo of the 1970s, the International Energy Agency (IEA) said.
The Paris-based agency said the conflict in the Middle East had caused the “largest disruption to crude supplies in the history of the global oil market”.
The amount of oil carried by tankers through the Strait of Hormuz has plunged from around 20 million barrels per day (mb/d) to “a trickle”, it said.
By contrast, around four mb/d were removed from global markets by the Arab oil embargo during the Yom Kippur war of 1973.
Not only is the hit to global supply bigger but production has also suffered a deeper blow. With “limited capacity” to bypass the Strait of Hormuz, Gulf countries have been forced to cut production by at least 10mb/d as storage sites have filled up, the IEA said. By contrast, production was reduced by about five mb/d in 1973.
Fatih Birol, the agency’s executive director, said: “Global energy markets are going through an extremely critical period due to developments in the Middle East.
“In particular, the closure of the Strait of Hormuz has caused serious disruptions in global oil and natural gas markets.”
He was speaking after IEA member states, including Britain, agreed on Wednesday to release 400 million barrels of oil from global strategic reserves. It marks the biggest ever release from the emergency stockpiles.
Mr Birol said the announcement had already made a “strong impact”. However, oil surged above $100 a barrel on Thursday after Iran’s new supreme leader vowed to keep the Strait of Hormuz closed to expand the theatre of conflict.
Two oil tankers were struck overnight in the Gulf in a suspected Iranian attack.
Tehran also launched a new wave of attacks against Gulf energy targets on Thursday.
Bahrain told residents to stay inside and close windows after an Iranian attack on fuel tanks, while Saudi Arabia said it intercepted drones headed towards the Shaybah oil field and the embassies district.
Jim Reid, a Deutsche Bank analyst, wrote: “With each passing day, it gets harder to argue that the disruption to shipping and energy infrastructure will only prove temporary.”
In a post on Truth Social, Donald Trump tried to put a positive spin on the higher prices. He wrote: “The United States is the largest Oil Producer in the World, by far, so when oil prices go up, we make a lot of money.”
Chris Wright, the US energy secretary, separately dismissed suggestions from Iran that oil could hit $200 a barrel.
“I would say unlikely but we are focused on ⁠the military operation and solving a problem,” Mr Wright told CNN.
In a separate interview with CNBC, he said the US navy cannot escort ships through the Strait of Hormuz at present but said it was “quite likely” it could happen by the end of the month.
Mr Wright posted a message on X earlier this week saying the US navy had begun escorting ships, sending oil prices surging. He deleted the post without explanation shortly afterwards and the White House subsequently denied the claim.
Paul Gooden, the head of global natural resources at asset manager Ninety One, said a “PR battle” was raging over oil.
He said traders were focused on the speed at which the IEA would release the 400 million barrels of oil on to the global market.
Mr Gooden said: “You’ve got a 20 million barrel per day outage, you can maybe reroute four of that.
“You’ve maybe got three from strategic petroleum reserve releases, maybe Russia can do an incremental half, but the reality is you’ve still got a very big deficit.
“This is now all about the duration of the conflict and the Trump administration really has an incentive to make it seem like this is short.”
The post “Oil shock ‘worse than the 1970s’” first appeared on The Telegraph